Before launching into this week's column, follow-ups on old business. We bought a "new" car (a used Chevy HHR still under bumper-to-bumper warranty, for those who care), I sold the VW bus to the state as part of their smog-hog buy-back program, and I sold all my film camera gear (thank you, Columbus Camera Group and eBay).
Care to guess which got me more money, the car or the gear?
We now return to the regularly scheduled broadcast, the latest column in the series on my "1000 True Fan" experiment. I'm using "support" in two senses: what Contributors get from the program and what I have to do to maintain it. When I proposed this, Ken Tanaka correctly pointed out that administrative overhead was not ignorable. Fortunately, it's worked out pretty much as I expected.
Make no mistake, I didn't get anywhere close to 1000 True Fans (didn't expect to), I got 94. But those Contributors provided me with approximately $15,500 gross revenues, $12,500 net. That's about one third of what I need to live on, not a life-altering level of support but certainly a life-enhancing one that provides me with considerably more time to work on my art—the point of this.
This is a screenshot of my spreadsheet, with dummy entries to preserve my Contributors' privacy. This links to a mail merge template in Microsoft Word. (Click on the image to see it larger.)
My paperwork overhead ends up being under one day a month. To track Contributors, I created a simple spreadsheet. I copy each new Contributor's information into the spreadsheet and annotate it appropriately. The first eight columns are mailing information that I use with a Microsoft Word mail-merge template I created to generate adhesive mailing labels. "Subs" are abbreviations I used to record the tiers of support, monthly or annual payments, and U.S. or foreign Contributors. "Fee" is how much they're paying. "StartDate" lets me track when subscriptions are up. The next two columns get summed, so I always know what my monthly and one-time-annual revenues total. "Status" is scratch notes I use to I track whether I've mailed stuff I'm supposed to, e-mailed notifications, followed up on missed payments, etc.
What do the Contributors get in return? Periodic e-mails tell them how things are going with links to a private webpage where they can see recently finished pieces. Ideally I should be mailing them every month, but I haven't gotten my act entirely together. The emails don't take a lot of time, just few hours a month to prepare a couple of new JPEGs, write a newsletter, and have Mail bulk-email it.
Last Christmas I sent the Contributors a set of holiday notecards that I hand printed and signed as a surprise gift. Something like that lets people know that you appreciate what they're doing for you. People don't give you money if they don't think you're grateful. Like the newsletters, it's a way of making a connection, but it's a lot more tangible and has more impact. That was relatively time-consuming and expensive. Preparing and mailing 100 packets of five note cards and envelopes took me a good week and a half. So, I'm now up to around two days a month for support.
You can also do your Contributers favors. Last winter I offered them about a dozen extra dye transfer prints from the first TOP print sale at an extraordinarily low price, and super-cheap copies of my photo restoration book before the new edition came out. They also got advance notice of this year's print sale.
I promised people at least a half dozen photographs to choose from for their fulfillment gifts, but I ended up offering 13; here's my final selection. The first photo on this page is a dye transfer print that I overprinted for the TOP print sale, although all I had promised them were digital prints. Another unexpected perk.
The big outlay of time and money is coming up: notifying the first Contributors their subscriptions are fulfilled and they can pick their gift prints, and preparing and shipping those prints. It will wind up being about a dozen days work.
All told, probably three days a month go into supporting people who provide one third of my living expenses. If I tripled the number of subscribers, I could survive on this (barely) putting just a third of my time into "business." That's not bad! Beyond 300 Contributors, I'm not sure about my current workflow; I doubt it works for 500. If by some miracle I ever got to 1000 True Fans, it would definitely break; simple arithmetic shows support would become a full-time job. When would I do the art?!
On the other hand, at $133K/yr. net I could afford to contract out a lot of the administration. Heck, it's more money than Paula and I combined have made in our very best year; she could quit her job and become my manager. This is what's called a "champagne problem;" I should be so "unlucky" as to have it.
Now comes the Really Big Question: can I keep my True Fans? This is supposed to be an ongoing source of income for creative types, not a one-shot. The model breaks badly for my kind of business around that (I'll explain next time I write about this), so I'm nervous. In a couple of months, I'll be able to tell you how my efforts to keep Contributors has worked out.
Ctein's regular weekly column appears every Thursday morning. —MJ
This is absolutely fascinating. Guyana (where I live) is a very poor country which is exceptionally hard on its artists.
I earn significantly below what would be considered the poverty line in the US (although I have a very high quality of life, relatively) although I am a professional.
Very talented artists often cannot spare the time to create simply because they have to have a day job.
I still try to help a friend of mine, who is a painter, with irregular donations. In return she frames my photo prints from time to time at reduced prices. Her framing is the day job which supports her true calling.
I would be very pleased if I can present your subscription model to her as a plan which she can try to adopt.
Posted by: Nikhil Ramkarran | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 08:42 AM
The gear.
What do I win?
Posted by: Miserere | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 10:05 AM
Here's to champagne problems! May they dog the rest of your life!
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 10:21 AM
I own a small family winery (and do some photography on the side) and what you are describing sounds like our Cellar Club. People sign up and as long as they want to stay in the club they get charged every couple of months for a couple of bottles of wine. We have special deals for the club and they get to come to a couple of club only events at the winery. Even if we could get to 1000 club members, I don't think we would at our size. We are thinking of capping it at around 100 (35 club members now) It's simply too much to manage...
Posted by: Steve Snyder | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 10:43 AM
It's too bad you didn't decide to sell your VW privately within the VW community.
It can be very difficult to get original parts for these vehicles and even third party manufacturers cannot supply everything.
These state buy-back programs often scrap entire vehicles indiscriminately, forever preventing their parts from living on in other vehicles.
A private sale can be a much better recycling program.
Posted by: photogdave | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 11:17 AM
After working in several corporations for 25 years (before my current gig), from small ones to very large ones, I came to the conclusion that if I ever started a business that went well, when the overhead reached the point where I had to hire professional managers (administration) to run that part of the business, it would be time to sell the entire thing to someone else. At that point, from what I could tell had happened to others, it ceases to be fun. But so far, I've not had to worry about this.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 11:55 AM
Your business plan is cash-flow positive, which avoids the working capital problems associated with growth.
But, you did not specify any time or money for marketing the business, either to maintain your customer base at approximately 100 or to grow it to 300. This will absorb more resources than you think it will.
Posted by: Bill Rogers | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 03:17 PM
I subscribed because I wanted to get an acknowledged masters work into my hands. See it in the flesh as it were. To be honest Ctein's images, with a few exceptions, are not ones I appreciate so I was mooting whether or not I would re-subscribe and decided I would wait until I got my print. However in a strange way when I heard I was only one out of 94 it made me feel special so I will definitely re-subscribe for a further year. There must be marketing message in there somewhere.
Posted by: Paul Mc Cann | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 04:29 PM
Fortunately I'm freshly employed again so I think I'll go for another year. Interesting that during the 7 1/2 months I was unemployed I questioned owning a phone and paying for cable tv but I didn't question contributing to Mr. 's art.
Posted by: Tom | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 08:34 PM
Dear Nikhil,
That's very interesting! I think it would require some real thought as to how to adopt, because the "1000 True Fan" business model assumes that creation costs (time or money) for the artists are high but production and distribution costs are insignificantly low. For music and literature, distributed electronically, that is clearly true. What's novel about what I'm doing is that my friend, Peter Hentges, observed that production and distribution costs for physical photographs could be low enough that this would be effectively true.
Painting certainly doesn't fall into this category, unless your friend is extremely prolific. That doesn't mean the model can't be adapted to her, but you might need to do things differently to make it feasible.
I strongly recommend that you read my previous columns and all the comments, as well as any articles I linked to.
"1000 Photographic Fans...Maybe?"
"Does Ctein Have 100 'True Fans'?"
"Tips For Finding 1000 True Fans"
There's a lot of thought that's already gone into this and good descriptions of the various pitfalls that can arise.
Good luck!
~ pax \ Ctein
[ Please excuse any word-salad. MacSpeech in training! ]
======================================
-- Ctein's Online Gallery http://ctein.com
-- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
======================================
Posted by: ctein | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 11:11 PM
Dear Miserere,
Absolutely nothing, because you didn't win. I got $50 more for the VW bus.
But we're sending you a nice case of Turtle Wax as a consolation prize.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Steve,
A membership cap can, in fact, be a very useful marketing tool if you use it properly. The trick is to convey the idea to people who are vaguely considering signing up that they might lose out if they wait too long. The reality, if you've only got 35 subscribers right now and you're capping it at 100, is that the risk isn't very high. But you don't tell them that. You just tell them membership in the club is limited to 100 and the offer will be withdrawn without warning when you reach that number.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear photogdave,
No, I don't think it's too bad at all. While I probably got as much money from the state as I would've gotten selling the vehicle, I wasn't expecting that. I was expecting to get about half as much. I didn't care. I was performing a social service by getting a vehicle that consumed unreasonable amounts of fossil fuel and spewed out unreasonable amounts of pollution off the road. Our new vehicle gets 250% better mileage and it's well under 1/10 the amount of smog forming chemicals.
As a lifelong VW owner (up to this point) I'm never going to tell someone else that they shouldn't drive and love their ancient VWs. But if all of them were to magically disappear from the planet tomorrow, I would not shed a single tear.
As I said in my previous post, I don't much care for cars. But living in suburban San Francisco Bay Area doesn't leave me with many good alternatives. Nonetheless, over the 10 years that I had that VW bus, I drove it an average of only 110 miles a month. Anybody who knows this area notes that is no small achievement; I did my best to minimize my footprint. Now I'm scrapping the shoes.
~ pax \ Ctein
[ Please excuse any word-salad. MacSpeech in training! ]
======================================
-- Ctein's Online Gallery http://ctein.com
-- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
=====================================
Posted by: ctein | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 11:25 PM
Dear Robert,
Oh you bet, I am never, ever going to have an employee. The aggravation, inconvenience, and expense are huge.
Fortunately, should I ever be lucky enough to get near 1000 true fans, the majority of my administrative overhead can be contracted out; I wouldn't need to hire anyone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Bill,
As I described in my previous column, it was even more cash-flow-positive than I expected. Had I known how many people were willing to pay in one lump sum, I would have structured the offer somewhat differently.
Maintaining/expanding the contributor base is exactly what the last paragraph of this column alludes to. Yes, it's a big problem. I'm even thinking of throwing several thousand dollars at a professional marketing consultant I know and trust.
I'll be talking about all this stuff the next time I write about this.
One thing that works mildly in my favor: The administrative overhead the first year included startup costs (in terms of my time) that will not get repeated. I'm not going to need to redesign websites, spreadsheets, and mailing templates. As you and I are aware, doing that stuff takes a lot more time than nonprofessionals realize.
Truth is that if I didn't have the first TOP print sale from 2008 under my belt, I never would have even contemplated doing this. I simply would've had no idea how to go about it. That sale forced me to revamp and redesign a lot of how I did business. I didn't plan it that way going in, but it was the only way to survive.
~ pax \ Ctein
[ Please excuse any word-salad. MacSpeech in training! ]
======================================
-- Ctein's Online Gallery http://ctein.com
-- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
======================================
Posted by: ctein | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 11:38 PM
Dear Paul,
Well, it's a really good idea you decided to resubscribe for another year, because you selected the dye transfer print, which means you're still not getting to find out what a "master's" digital prints look like. Fortunately, through your foresight and generosity, you will find out next year.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Tom,
I just love a man who's got his priorities straight.
~ pax \ Ctein
[ Please excuse any word-salad. MacSpeech in training! ]
======================================
-- Ctein's Online Gallery http://ctein.com
-- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
======================================
Posted by: ctein | Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 11:41 PM
You should have sell the camera gear to your contributor. How about "This is the actual lens who takes this picture!"
Posted by: Dennis Ng | Friday, 19 March 2010 at 08:13 AM
Proud to be one of the 94
Posted by: Marcus | Friday, 19 March 2010 at 10:25 AM
Dear Ctein,
Thank you for the links, I shall be sure to go through them carefully. As it happens I was so excited by the idea yesterday that I went over to my friend and had a chat with her.
What it looks like we are coming up with is more a patronage scheme than a true subscription.
The average starting wage for a new graduate here is between US$250 and US$500 per month.
We thought that if she could get between 5 and 10 patrons contributing US$50 per month she could ease a lot of her more pressing day to day concerns and concentrate on her painting.
In return, she would offer to this limited set of people one painting (of a size to be determined by her) per year, plus advantageous pricing on her other work, including framing.
She thinks she can handle 5 to 10 paintings per year.
Issues of distribution, such as would arise in your case, would not apply here as the population is relatively small and concentrated in one small geographical region.
I can't remember the last time I was this excited over an issue of money :)
Posted by: Nikhil Ramkarran | Friday, 19 March 2010 at 10:53 AM
Dear Dennis,
Ha ha ha ha, I LOVE it! An opportunity wasted; vast riches could have been mine if only I had thought to market my ever-so-collectible (not!) gear properly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Nikhil,
I think it's great that you two are thinking up a way to make this work for her. I don't know anything about Guyanan culture, so I wouldn't have any idea what sorts of approaches to people and marketing techniques would work there. The basic rule, though, is to be creative. Always be trying to think of things that would entice new people to join and would enhance your relationship with people who already have.
~ pax \ Ctein
[ Please excuse any word-salad. MacSpeech in training! ]
======================================
-- Ctein's Online Gallery http://ctein.com
-- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
=====================================
Posted by: ctein | Saturday, 20 March 2010 at 11:29 PM